Hi, tomas wrote: > > Yep. The one image is encoded as CCITT > > It compresses much worse than the other which is JPEG,
Anders Andersson wrote: > Not sure what you mean by "compresses much worse" here, but the CCITT > version is much smaller than the JPEG version. Because it uses 1 bit per channel/color whereas the other file uses 8 bpc. The fact that their size ratio is less than 1:8 demonstrates the lossy compression power of the algorithm used in the 8 bpc image. kamaraju kusumanchi, the OP, might see differences between both files if using a viewer that can zoom-in far enough that scan pixels of 1/600 inch become larger than the screen pixels. Have a nice day :) Thomas
