-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 02:19:49PM +0200, Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Friday, 10 Aug 2018 at 12:42, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > [1] I know what I'm talking about: I've watched the slow and painful > > process of replacing mail with something more "modern" (O365) in > > a big corp, and the underhanded tactics of badmouthing and > > marginalizing fueled by a Microsoft-supported "team". > > +1. > > I've been forced to use O365 at work. Luckily, there's still pop access > to this so I can manage my email with the tools I want (which, in my > case, is gnus in Emacs giving me splitting, adaptive scoring, > expiry, ...; YMMV).
In my case they even had imap running (guess they didn't know [2]...) Cheers [2] Although with the years, I am more and more prone to what I call tomas's bastard: "Any sufficiently advanced malice can't be distinguished from stupidity" -- a kind of unholy cross-over between Hanlon's Razor and Clarke's Third Law. Some call this "plausible deniability", I guess. - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAltu4/gACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaB2ACfV3DdaKlCAyevZaOBA7Dy9cny DBMAni8bBidpQp+41ThJvAxFKwYrorvy =FKes -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
