Joel Rees: > kAt, write a novel. > > My dad used to tell me, if I wanted to change things, I'd have to > change them from the inside. It's a poor expression of the principle > because you can't get "inside" far enough without X, Y, or Z, and they > all make it very difficult to change things once you are inside.
Once you are inside you are too pre-occupied in protecting what you are inside of. Change will never come from inside. Joe: > On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:11:30 -0500 > David Wright <deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote: > >> BTW I was surprised not to see mention of the Ken Thompson hack >> in what I snipped. > > Old stuff. I'd expect every significant compiler on the planet to have > been compromised by one government or another long ago. It makes no longer a difference, or is it worthwhile to distinguish, between corporate and gov. It is one long chain of domination, no borders, no nations, no private/public separation. One huge system of control. But minds can unplug themselves of the system of illusion. There should be no need for security in a free world/system. Isn't this where unix started from? No locks, no doors, no borders. Instead we are preoccupied in drawing 2 dimensional limits under the eye in the 3rd dimension. Multilingual wikipedia is probably the only thing worth saving from this civilization. -- "The most violent element in society is ignorance" rEG "Who died and made you the superuser?" Brooklinux