On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 06:37:03PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 06:44:08PM +0300, Reco wrote: > > Describing Fedora as 'community-driven' distribution is a gross > > oversimplification. It's not that I disagree with initial assessment - > > they don't sell you Debian stable like Red Hat does for RHEL. > > Red Hat employees do have significant involvement in Fedora. This is true. > May I ask, what model would you prefer? > > Disclaimer: I am a Red Hat employee, but I have nothing to do with Fedora.
Both, actually. Debian stable works for me. RHEL works for my current employer. Being realist I have to accept that it's much easier to use a Linux distribution for *commercial purposes* if there's some price tag attached to it (or to the support of said distribution). An ablility to redirect responsibility to support is priceless. But for the non-commercial purposes and personal use RHEL is way too enterprisey for my taste. Too little software, too much 'do it our way' approach. Hence - Debian for my needs. Reco
