On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:40:00PM +0000, GiaThnYgeia wrote: > As for the other post you commented on with the same attitude I would > have to say that getting technical in comparing sysv with competing > technologies does not answer the political part of the decision making. > It seems as this part is what irritated people not the technical aspects > of it. Unless there are those that pretend the decision making process > was solely on technical merits.
The decision to switch the default init to systemd was made by the Tech
Committee. You can read the history of that decision here
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=727708
There's also a related General Resolution that was written, adapted and
voted on by Debian members. The full details of that are here
https://www.debian.org/vote/2014/vote_003
As for "who", 483 Debian Developers voted, as listed here
https://www.debian.org/vote/2014/vote_003_voters.txt
All this stuff is in the open for anyone to read and catch up on. I
hope you find it enlightening.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
