Am 05.04.2017 um 20:05 schrieb Dan Ritter: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:26:03PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Am 05.04.2017 um 17:04 schrieb Dan Ritter: >>> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 03:47:33PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: >>>> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 05:06:22AM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote: >>>>> Aside from being insulting, this is just plain untrue. There are well >>>>> over >>>>> 100,000 professional Linux sysadmins worldwide. I'd estimate that at >>>>> least >>>>> a third of them administer at least one - and probably more than one - >>>>> systems that work better with sysvinit than with systemd. >>>> >>>> That estimate sounds plucked out of the air to me. >>> >>> It certainly is. >>> >>> For example, I run on the order of a thousand servers that are >>> running Wheezy because we haven't managed a smooth transition to >>> Jessie yet, and systemd is a large part of that problem. >>> >> >> what problems exactly do you have which are caused by systemd? > > We have our own applications, built over the last 19 years, that > are managed by sysvinit scripts which are handled by a configuration > management system that we built and open-sourced before Chef or Puppet > were born. Nobody wants to rewrite all of this. Initial testing of > systemd compatibility were negative, and nothing looked so easy to fix > that someone jumped up and said "I'll do that!" >
Any specifics? What problems did you run into with the sysv compat support in systemd? -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
