On 16/02/2017 06:44, solitone wrote: > I'm happy with backup2l [1]. It's very simple to configure, supports > incremental backups, and it's fully automated.
A bit of configuration is required but it seems ok and easy enough! > I also like it because it is simple to extract specific files you may need > from > a backup. Yes, extracting specific files from a backup should also be a non-trouble task for me and users in general. That's why I've used rsync until now (all files and dirs are saved as they originally are, in the destination folder -- very easy to locate something, just navigating through the filesystem :)). Thanks. -- fp pgp: 0x45399C26
