Adam Wilson wrote: > > I consider the second world war an extension of the first- there really > was only one "hot" World War, from the 1910s to the 1940s, with two major > outbreaks of violence as the old (European) imperial order collapsed and > the new (American) imperial order arose. > > The net result was that Europe was knocked off its throne and the US > ascended to Europe's former position in those turbulent 40 years or so.
Adam Wilson, I like you more and more. Thanks for taking your time. I got tired after someone got rude, but I am glad I see someone who shares my opinion more or less. I must admit that you put forward my thoughts in much better English and order. Yes there is a big crises with those two wars and the reason was to reshape the world. In fact all starts somewhen in the 18th century, but the escalation was obvious in the 20th. However I'm sick of hearing here that the USA won somehow the WWII. They moved into Europe in 1944. Of course they helped, but as nowdays (and this was my point in the first mail) they supported both sides, knowing that this way they get weaker. Just as today they support ISIS and pretend to fight ISIS in the same time - hypocrisy pure. At least the Soviets did not pretend to be democracy. They called it dictatorship of the people. For the western world now it should dictatorship of corporations. regards
