On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:35:53 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 21:11, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:13:01 -0600, > > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 17:14, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: > > > > I am getting the following result on my filesystem. How do I > > > > correct it? > > > > > > > > # df > > > > Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted > > > > on/dev/hda1 -1006130973579 1 0 24% / > > > > /dev/hda2 -1006139352819 1 0 8% > > > > /home > > > > > > Woody? Sarge, what? > > > > > > How big is /dev/hda? > > > > .."not big enough". I got similar responses on trying to dd a > > Knoppix iso onto an old 730M disk. ;-) > > What do you mean? Did the df(1) give that weird result before or > after the dd(1)? ..after, the dd failed at about 99.something and df -h owed in the Exa range. ;-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
