On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 22:52, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: > Quoting Jeffrey L. Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Quoting Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 19:44, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: > > > > Quoting Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 17:14, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: > > > > > > I am getting the following result on my filesystem. How do I correct > > > > > > it? > > > > > > > > > > > > # df > > > > > > Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > > > > > > /dev/hda1 -1006130973579 1 0 24% / > > > > > > /dev/hda2 -1006139352819 1 0 8% /home > > > > > > > > > > Woody? Sarge, what? > > > > > > > > > > How big is /dev/hda? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Woody: fileutils 4.1-10 > > > > > > > > /dev/hda is approximately 8.9GB > > > > > > > > # df -Hi > > > > Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on > > > > /dev/hda1 489k 53k 436k 11% / > > > > /dev/hda2 489k 11k 478k 3% /home > > > > > > How big is the complete /dev/hda? > > > > > > I'm using fileutils 5.0-5 from testing, and it handles a 120GB > > > /dev/hda perfectly: > > > $ df > > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > > > /dev/hda3 7874560 161148 7313396 3% / > > > /dev/hda2 46668 2871 41388 7% /boot > > > /dev/hda5 7874528 2264344 5210168 31% /usr > > > /dev/hda6 7874528 1088952 6385560 15% /var > > > /dev/hda7 7874528 561168 6913344 8% /home > > > /dev/hda8 87953148 1152008 86801140 2% /data > > > > > > > > > > Not particularly big, approx. 8.9GB. That's what's surprising. > > > > I may try the testing fileutils if the dependencies don't break > > everything. > > > > Jeffrey > > > > > > Whatever it is, it is not limited to df. When I try and run amanda > from another computer, backing up this machine, I get this error: > > ERROR: maelstorm: [dir /tmp/amanda needs 64KB, only has -2147483648KB available.] > > maelstorm is the Debian machine. The AMANDA server is a SuSE machine.
Maybe an fsck is in order? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jefferson, LA USA Some former UNSCOM officials are alarmed, however. Terry Taylor, a British senior UNSCOM inspector from 1993 to 1997, says the figure of 95 percent disarmament is "complete nonsense because inspectors never learned what 100 percent was. UNSCOM found a great deal and destroyed a great deal, but we knew [Iraq's] work was continuing while we were there, and I'm sure it continues," says Mr. Taylor, now head of the Washington http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0829/p01s03-wosc.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
