Hello again and thanks for the suggestions. I cannot use the same name because scim is not sc with some new features, nor is an improvement over it, its just another application. It should be entirely compatible with sc, but in the inside, is a completely different app.
> El 23/02/2015, a las 11:32, Liam O'Toole <liam.p.oto...@gmail.com> escribió: > >> On 2015-02-23, Petter Adsen <pet...@synth.no> wrote: >> --Sig_/rpAzsNcN+cDo.tN.Ondk0c6 >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> >> On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:52:29 +0000 (UTC) >> Liam O'Toole <liam.p.oto...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Anyway, regardless of the terminology, simply to appropriate the name >>> "sc" might be perceived as bad manners. I would encourage the OP to >>> attempt to contact the former developers(s) first if he or she wishes >>> to use that name. >> >> Or, if that fails, what about "sc2"? >> >> Petter > > Indeed. Or perhaps "sc-ng". > > -- > > Liam > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnmemefq.729.liam.p.otoole@dipsy.tubbynet > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/4751312e-2e5b-4d04-b8a8-7ccde5ab7...@gmail.com