On 02/23/15 13:00, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:01:22AM +0100, Christian Groessler wrote:
Why not just keep the original name, "sc"?
I don't think it's actively developed elsewhere, so the new improved version
could be distinguished by the version number.
That sounds like a recipe for confusion. Some people, no doubt still use
the old version.
Could be, although I don't think so.
Is there any software that has done this? AFAIK, all forks have changed
the name.
"fork" implicates two or more (independend) development branches.
I believe, correct me if I'm wrong, "sc" was orphaned since at least 15
years.
So, the OP when he started to add new features/bug fixes/etc., created a
"new
version", not a "branch". So an obvious thing would be to bump the
version number.
Now if someone else shows up to independently improve the program, (s)he
should
create a branch.
regards,
chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54eb1aec.7070...@groessler.org
