-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 26/11/2014 11:07 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote: > And *what do we know about the original "customisation"* that was > made - which may have 'some' bearing on the "badness" of the > upgrade/update "defaults"??
Oh, I get it, you think Debian is perfect and that systemd could not possibly be the cause of the problem -- that's funny; now I understand why you are so unreasonable with people having issues with systemd. In short, you are deluded. A. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iF4EAREIAAYFAlR1MOEACgkQqBZry7fv4vvCwQEAvpXN3PVcvMKUDqLkaCQW9j6v ZJhCAhwTTyf1ei6iFacBALBB6v22pezoPCUbP4gMl/DDdEFi0kIxnJKdMzJFoRCQ =dQ7y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/547530e2.40...@affinityvision.com.au
