On Sun 23 Nov 2014 at 20:13:06 +0100, Erwan David wrote: > Le 23/11/2014 20:09, Brian a écrit : > > > > It would be nice if you regarded the word "functionally" as an essential > > qualification of "equivalent" or "identical" and not dismiss it. > > > If "functionnally" is the only criteria, then its time to flee. You may > have same functionality (and I am not sure systemd is functionnaly > equivalent to sysvinit) witheg proprietary and free software : would you > then acceot the proprietary software ? You have also different secuity, > different audit, etc... > > if you consider only functionlaity for equivalence, then windows is > equivalent to debian.
It's possible you have misunderstood the process which "functionally" is applied to. Tanstaafl explains it in his mail. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141123202826.gw3...@copernicus.demon.co.uk
