Hallo,
* Nate Bargmann [Mon, Nov 17 2014, 07:46:48AM]:
> > Since systemd hatters usually fail on the second task, the rhetorical
> > arsenal is chosen accordingly (ad-hominem, trolling, misquoting, ...).
> Here is the crux of the problem in these discussions and that is the use
> of "haters" as an ad hominem as part of the shaming language directed at
> those with concerns. It matters not who started it, but when one of the
There is no offensive of discriminatory meaning implied; you have read
my definition and that's how I apply it. Not more, not less.
> primary developers of systemd also engages in using this language to
> describe those who do have legitimate concerns, the discussion descends
> quickly into a non-productive direction especially when others follow
> his lead as being somehow acceptable.
If the final outcome is simply pidgeonholing into "those with us" vs.
"those against us" then I agree. But for somebody not participating in
this stupid holly wars about systemd this argument sounds somehow
far-fetched.
Regards,
Eduard.
--
<taner> alpha welche distro hast du eigentlich???
-- gefragt im Channel #debian.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/20141117185804.ga9...@rotes76.wohnheim.uni-kl.de
