Laurent Bigonville:
The systemd umbrella project is made of 10+ different executables
> that have all a specific scope (systemd PID1 used to manage the life
> cycles of the daemons, systemd-logind manage the user sessions,
> systemd-journald a logging system,...) and that are all
> communicating using well defined, stable and documented dbus
> interfaces that allow one to reimplement the functionalities as long
> as it exposes the same interfaces (ie. this is what systemd-shim is
> doing).
Not correct. The "systemd process" D-Bus API is not stable and not
covered by the interface guarantee. It's exactly this that is part of
the hoo-hah and part of the problem with systemd-shim over the past year
or so.
*
http://homepage.ntlworld.com./jonathan.deboynepollard/FGA/debian-systemd-packaging-hoo-hah.html
It's systembsd that is reimplementing the functionalities of the stable
interfaces, and it's as yet neither finished on BSD nor ported to Linux.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54582c10.5060...@ntlworld.com
