On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:37:30 +0100 Martin Read <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 14/10/14 15:56, Steve Litt wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:25:23 +0300 > > Andrei POPESCU <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Have you actually looked into what depends on systemd? > > > > PAM is enough for me, considering everything that uses PAM. They > > could have made their PAM plug compatible with the old PAM, but > > nooooooo. > > I find these statements confusing, and crave enlightenment. When I > look up libpam-systemd on packages.d.o, I see the following sentence: > > "This package contains the PAM module which registers user sessions > in the systemd control group hierarchy." > > and the following dependencies: > > dep: libpam-runtime (>= 1.0.1-6) > Runtime support for the PAM library > > dep: libpam0g (>= 0.99.7.1) > Pluggable Authentication Modules library > > Now, I may be being dim here, but it looks to me like that means that > libpam-systemd is, in fact, plug-compatible with PAM. So are you saying I could use sysvinit or nosh as my PID1, drop in libpam-systemd and no other systemd components, and have all PAM functionalities run properly? Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
