On 14/10/14 15:56, Steve Litt wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:25:23 +0300
Andrei POPESCU <andreimpope...@gmail.com> wrote:
Have you actually looked into what depends on systemd?
PAM is enough for me, considering everything that uses PAM. They could
have made their PAM plug compatible with the old PAM, but nooooooo.
I find these statements confusing, and crave enlightenment. When I look
up libpam-systemd on packages.d.o, I see the following sentence:
"This package contains the PAM module which registers user sessions in
the systemd control group hierarchy."
and the following dependencies:
dep: libpam-runtime (>= 1.0.1-6)
Runtime support for the PAM library
dep: libpam0g (>= 0.99.7.1)
Pluggable Authentication Modules library
Now, I may be being dim here, but it looks to me like that means that
libpam-systemd is, in fact, plug-compatible with PAM.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/543d433a.6040...@zen.co.uk
