Brian wrote:
On Tue 14 Oct 2014 at 06:34:17 +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
On 14/10/2014 5:56 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 13 oct 14, 12:34:27, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Again.. when did the desktop become the priority for Debian. For years,
Debian (and Linux in general) has been most useful in the server
environment. Breaking server deployments, at the expense of the desktop
seems like bad policy.
Do you have any evidence of systemd breaking your setup? If yes, would
you please be so kind to at least file corresponding bugs?
Hell no. I have no time at all for testing at the moment - I've got
production systems to maintain, and security holes to patch (I haven't
even begun to think how many new security holes sytsemd is going to
introduce).
A great big +1 from me too.
Exactly.
Although I'm up with patching, but I most definitely don't want any
system that I am responsible to maintain to have systemd installed, it
is far too much risk and the changes are not warranted.
Are you incapable of reading what is on debian-user, even threads you
have participated in in the past few days?
Not having systemd as PID 1 is so easy it's unbelievable.
Gee.... assuming that you don't run anything that has systemd
dependencies and/or systemd-shim is actually maintained and kept up-to-date.
I've been seeing all together too many reports to the contrary. Maybe
YOU haven't been paying attention.
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/543c5291.80...@meetinghouse.net
