On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:59:24AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Which does kind of lead back to the question of what's the point of > a social contract that says users and their needs are the priority.
The point is that the people involved in the processes we do have: the developers, the technical committee; should be considering users first and foremost with their actions. I have no reason to doubt that the tech-ctte did exactly that. However, if you think there's an impedence mismatch between SC ยง4 and the processes we have in practice: for example, if you think there should be some mechanism whereby non-DD users can have a say - then please propose something concrete. Discussing a proposal would be on-topic for the debian-project mailing list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141013144226.gc24...@chew.redmars.org
