Ahoj, Dňa Sat, 20 Sep 2014 01:51:56 +1200 Chris Bannister <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> napísal:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 05:04:02PM +0100, J Rowan wrote: > > > > I'm aware that nothing can possibly be set in stone yet, but the > > people responsible for systemd-shim and other compatibility > > components must have a fair idea whether these are intended as > > temporary workarounds until 'all' packages are compatible with > > systemd, or whether they are expected to remain permanent parts of > > Debian. > > Right. But also consider: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746578 > > Don't worry, the issue is being treated very seriously. Thanks for this link! I read it carefully to learn more about root of today's problems, which i see in Debian and i want to write, that i don't understand this. I am a long Debian user and use it in most of my servers and all my home machines (include wife's and daughter's machines). During these years i was fully satisfied and appreciated how are changes implemented here and i see the DD and DM as responsible people, which carefully consider all changes from different point of view before they are applied. AS result of my complacence i start to contribute by way, with i can help (mostly translations). In these years i see, how things become better, problems become solved, etc. Great work from all involved! But in last year or two i see, that something is changing away from this direction and all seems to get the apex with the systemd. I not mean that the systemd becomes default - i never care about defaults (and i use recommended defaults only sometime). But in last time i have feeling, that the users becomes the latest and the topmost is somethings as self-promotion, which i consider as bad direction and from link you provided i see, that i am not only one. I feel, that some maintainers know better than users, what is best for them (users). Terrible to continue, when one become on the second rail. In these years i found as terrible to communicate only with two or three maintainers (or maintainer(s) of two or three packages?), where they was not able to accept, that their package(s) can have a bug. These problems i solved by selecting alternative package. But now... Is now a time to forgot at trust that the DD and DM know what they are doing? What will be follow? regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
