Le 02/09/2014 19:58, John Hasler a écrit : > Erwan David writes: >> Please read the article pointed by the OP. > I wrote: >> Nobody is going to impose any changes on the Debian packaging system. >> That's a nonstarter. > Erwan David writes: >> Even if in some later version systemd works only with this kind of >> scheme ? > Yes. Remember the LSB? What you suggest might actually be a good > thing. Debian would fork Systemd and then fix it, or else switch to > Upstart or something as a default. > > And don't forget that Systemd is only the *default*. The best thing to > do at this point is to express strong interest in and support for > alternatives. File bugs and raise a stink whenever you find a package > that gratuitously requires Systemd. Offer patches when you can.
aptitude remove systemd -> downgrade almost everything to stable... Ok no program present in stable should depend on systemd... that's a lot of bugs to open... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5406069d.5010...@rail.eu.org
