Erwan David writes: > Please read the article pointed by the OP. I wrote: > Nobody is going to impose any changes on the Debian packaging system. > That's a nonstarter.
Erwan David writes: > Even if in some later version systemd works only with this kind of > scheme ? Yes. Remember the LSB? What you suggest might actually be a good thing. Debian would fork Systemd and then fix it, or else switch to Upstart or something as a default. And don't forget that Systemd is only the *default*. The best thing to do at this point is to express strong interest in and support for alternatives. File bugs and raise a stink whenever you find a package that gratuitously requires Systemd. Offer patches when you can. -- John Hasler [email protected] Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
