On 8/8/14, Joel Rees <joel.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: >> On Thu 07 Aug 2014 at 16:53:10 +0300, David Baron wrote:
>>> Wish there were not so many bugs around systemd. No objection to it as >>> long as >>> it works. >> >> The number of bugs on >> >> >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=systemd;dist=unstable >> >> doesn't seen that high for a package of its importance and visibility. >> Most reports have had a response. Some reports are not bugs. >> >> If you value a low blood pressure don't look at the bug page for apt. :) > > This is precisely why systemd should have been brought up to speed in > a separate, parallel, volunteer-only distro. > > (If you don't understand what I mean by a separate, parallel, > volunteer-only distribution, think of kfreebsd, but a little closer to > home.) > > I'd still say there's time for debian to go for a course correction, Seriously? What is sid for? I guess by that logic, the big X11 changes should have been in such a parallel debian, and the libc5->libc6 likewise? Which types of big changes should be in your proposed separate, parallel, volunteer-only (as if Debian is not) distribution? Perhaps we could call that, oh I dunno, Debian experimental? > but everyone seems to be determined to ignore the obvious. Hell no! I think we should encourage a Debian experimental distro, which is volunteer only (absolutely no paid contributors) and should be separate to sid and testing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAOsGNSQYobp9ienvd=nksbsjyr5osu5hxzxay+dqsfnm4u4...@mail.gmail.com
