On Fri 18 Jul 2014 at 18:10:58 +0200, Erwan David wrote: > Le 18/07/2014 17:52, Brian a ??crit : > > On Fri 18 Jul 2014 at 11:21:51 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > > >> I don't think one single person objected to the systemd software > >> itself. It's right for some, not so right for others. > >> > >> All the objections had to do with forcing people to accept systemd. Vim > >> and Emacs are both excellent, but if we all were forced to adopt Emacs, > >> or if we were all forced to adopt Vim, all hell would break loose. > >> > >> The other thing is, a lot of people thought the current init system was > >> working just fine. > > They choose to stick with it then. Noone is being forced to accept > > systemd. > > > > Opting out of the switch > > ======================== > > > > If users want to opt out of the switch, they can install the > > sysvinit-core package which will satisfy the dependency of the "init" > > package > > > > https://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > > > > > > That's quite afalse this... count every package which depends direectly > or indirectly on systemd, often without real need...
I have no testing install to hand at the moment so perhaps you could list these packages for us. Please indicate the ones for which there is no "real need". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
