On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > Am 07.07.2014 21:29, schrieb Andrei POPESCU: >> To prove my point (on a laptop with LXDE and just a few services): >> $ grep sleep /etc/init.d/* | wc -l >> 27 >> $ ls /etc/init.d/* | wc -l >> 75 > > Yup, the boot speed improvements come from doing things correctly and > event based. Socket activation doesn't necessarily mean things are > delayed but simply that explicit orderings are unnecessary. > > The numbers you have posted are depressing, but doing that over the > complete archive is even more so. > > The last time I did an archive wide check on this was early 2014, at > that time we had 1235 SysV init scripts and 1124 occurences of sleep.
The existence of a sleep call is neither here nor there. For example, there are many servers that I could try to connect to with a 1 second timeout, then sleep for a second if that failed, and try again. That would be better use of the processor than not using sleep at all. -- Joel Rees Be careful where you see conspiracy. Look first in your own heart. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caar43imanagqb1vfw6euu0agvqigp+xgud78hx-29cxb0em...@mail.gmail.com