Fred Wilson writes:
> What systemd brings is something usefull only for companies that has
> money to pay for high-end servers, clusters, supercomputers
I mostly disagree with this point of view, since these machine rarely
stop.
There could be some benefit in elastic provision ov VMs and if you
choose to use green policies that require the shutdown of a physical
machine.
But again, hybernation could be a better choice.
I see systemd as something that address more small system user-needs
than big-iron user-needs.
--
/\ ___ Ubuntu: ancient
/___/\_|_|\_|__|___Gian Uberto Lauri_____ African word
//--\| | \| | Integralista GNUslamico meaning "I can
\/ coltivatore diretto di software not install
già sistemista a tempo (altrui) perso... Debian"
Warning: gnome-config-daemon considered more dangerous than GOTO
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/21268.34704.640314.919...@mail.eng.it
