On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 10:32 +0100, Slavko wrote: > I personaly don't like the democratic system, where anybody > participate on the decisions
Neither Debian, nor the distro we should not mention are democratic, but for both distros everybody is allowed to make decisions, when becoming a member of the team. And it's possible to stay informed for both distros and to talk about veto at the right time. All I was saying is, that if somebody has got a veto against systemd. this is around 3 years to late, for Debian and more than ever fotr the distro we should not mention. I just mentioned the distro we should not mention, because I've got experiences with a _real_ systemd, by using this distro and for this distro it started with such a hybrid Debian currently provides too. I've seen all the steps from SysVinti to the hybrid pseudo-systemd (similar to the one Debian does provide now) to the _real_ systemd. I'm using Debian with SysVinit and I don't fear the switch to the _real_ systemd. My intention is to encourage people to use systemd, not to stay away from it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1393754516.596.204.camel@archlinux
