On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 05:01:07AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 18:08:33 -0700, > Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 04:59:08PM -0400, Bijan Soleymani wrote: > > [snip] > > > > I was aware of all your facts and reasonings before you spoke. > > We just part ways on our interpretation of the facts. > > > > I'll repeat: anyplace people want to kill us, we want to kill them. > > ..I believe I covered this ;-) in my post > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. ;-) > > > Yes, Bin Laden is more important than Sadam. > > ..why? ;-) On asking "those who will not kill" to "step aside" in a > recent tape, Osama bin Laden _actually_ honors the status of > civilians as required by the 4 Geneva Conventions. ;-) > How about Saddam and Sissy Boy George? ;-)
Please don't practice moral equivalency. > > -- > ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) > ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... > Scenarios always come in sets of three: > best case, worst case, and just in case. > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
