On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 18:08:33 -0700, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 04:59:08PM -0400, Bijan Soleymani wrote: > [snip] > > I was aware of all your facts and reasonings before you spoke. > We just part ways on our interpretation of the facts. > > I'll repeat: anyplace people want to kill us, we want to kill them. ..I believe I covered this ;-) in my post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. ;-) > Yes, Bin Laden is more important than Sadam. ..why? ;-) On asking "those who will not kill" to "step aside" in a recent tape, Osama bin Laden _actually_ honors the status of civilians as required by the 4 Geneva Conventions. ;-) How about Saddam and Sissy Boy George? ;-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
