On 8/7/12, Andrei POPESCU <andreimpope...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Vi, 03 aug 12, 16:28:30, Joel Rees wrote: >> >> systemd is far too disruptive to have been stuffed into the main >> branch of Fedora the way it was. Good engineering would have been to >> have set up two concurrent forks of Fedora, to keep reference points >> available when working on the integration, and to provide a safety net >> when systemd's basic design errors surface. > > You are of course aware that the purpose of Fedora is to experiment with > new technologies. From > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedora_(operating_system) > > ,---- > | One of Fedora's main objectives is not only to contain software > | distributed under a free and open source license, but also to be on the > | leading edge of such technologies. > `----
<sarcasm> Guess I was lulled into a false sense of security by the first ten years of Fedora. </sarcasm> Of course, there is also this, on Fedora's own site, as opposed to wikipedia: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Foundations which talks about a lot more than just being on the leading edge. But you don't really want to suggest we debate the purpose of Fedora on the Debian user list? > Kind regards, > Andrei > -- > Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic > -- Joel Rees -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caar43inv5tef5pdfat_3zd1fomev8jydyfd3kwxnsti8pnc...@mail.gmail.com
