On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Mika Suomalainen <mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On 25.05.2012 15:49, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 17:37 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: >>> >>> deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main >>> deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main >>> deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main >>> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main >> >> You're issue is related to the sid repository. If you need something >> from sid, then uncomment it and after that comment it. Don't feel secure >> using pinning. >> >> You can name the repositories "stable" instead of "squeeze", so it will >> use "stable" what ever Debian "stable" is named. > > Is it safe to use "stable" instead of "squeeze"? Are there usually any > conflicts or anything what would need "full-upgrade" whenever new > "stable" is named?
No. No need for "aptitude full-upgrade", even "apt-get upgrade"/"aptitude safe-upgrade" will pull in wheezy (partially) when it becomes "stable". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=sxbfo9v909tyot1g2o8zyvufo6fvz6bmd6zld2cgsg...@mail.gmail.com
