On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Mika Suomalainen <mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com> wrote: > 09.05.2012 11:56, Jon Dowland kirjoitti: >> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: >>> Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not >>> You waste our time and bandwidth. >> >> In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures >> are valid. >> >>> Bob's key validates his identity - yours does not. >>> I can verify that "Bob" is "Bob" through a chain of trust. >> >> Why does Mikka's not? It's not impossible for someone to have a trust >> path to Mikka. Albeit one step removed, since the signing key he uses >> has one signature, from another of his keys - but that one has at >> least one. (I haven't managed to construct a trust path to Mikka >> myself, since most of the public pathfinder servers don't have his >> key) > > Because nobody else near Kotka, Finland uses PGP and the nearest CAcert > assurers are after 110KMs from me. > > PS. I am back to weird long signatures. I won't comment to this thread > anymore nor to anything else which I haven't written in my signature or > elsewhere.
So your reaction to being told that your signature's too long is to lengthen it. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=szlrrs-d_z+m+8ry3cnmyvu0e6h_d6jjskmh2wtzvv...@mail.gmail.com
