On 09/05/12 19:39, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:20:15PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: >> On 09/05/12 18:56, Jon Dowland wrote: >>> In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures >>> are valid. >> >> All his posts? >> Is cutting and pasting a hobby? >> Do you between "some" and "all"? > > The ones I've bothered to verify
Most of his original ones did not verify. >, via '|gpg --verify' in mutt. So you didn't cut and paste - you just hand processed each post. I can't match your dedication to validating his posts - nor can I muster your enthusiasm for defending them. I'll side with the others that find them an unnecessary annoyance. <snipped> > >> Because there's no chain of trust. > > Confirmed? >(you've trimmed my initial investigation which indicates he > has at least one signatory.) "investigation"? Huh? How hard was it to see the key is signed by... the key holder (or another person called Mika?), using a key that was signed... by (Mika). That's *not* a chain of trust. It's not even the issue. More noise, no signal. <snipped> Regards -- Iceweasel/Firefox/Chrome/Chromium/Iceape/IE extensions for finding answers to questions about Debian:- https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections/Scott_Ferguson/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4faa4490.4070...@gmail.com
