On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:26:18 +0100, Darac Marjal wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 02:21:49PM +0000, Camaleón wrote: >> On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 08:17:52 -0500, ntrfug wrote: >> >> > On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 13:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> It can't be the "same" message, that's for sure ;-) >> > >> > Yes, it can. >> > >> > It is. >> > >> > Exactly the same. >> >> Show us, please. >> >> I really doubt you get a message pointing to NTFS-G3 or Tuxera website >> for a volume formatted with ext2 or reiserfs. That would be something >> worth seeing :-) > > I imagine it might be possible to get this behaviour if > /proc/filesystems is suggesting ntfs-3G ahead of reiserfs and ext2. In > that case, I can well imagine NTFS-3G borking as above in such a manner > that it prevents other filesystems from being tried.
(...) It wouldn't be the first time I see a filesystem (x) being detected and wanted to be mounted as (y) but that would be a completely different problem and a corner case, though it can happen. > ntrfug, could you post your /proc/filesystems here, please? @ntrfug: I'm still waiting for the requested logs >>;-) Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jleuth$8qv$4...@dough.gmane.org
