On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 02:21:49PM +0000, Camaleón wrote: > On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 08:17:52 -0500, ntrfug wrote: > > > On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 13:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> It can't be the "same" message, that's for sure ;-) > > > > Yes, it can. > > > > It is. > > > > Exactly the same. > > Show us, please. > > I really doubt you get a message pointing to NTFS-G3 or Tuxera website > for a volume formatted with ext2 or reiserfs. That would be something > worth seeing :-)
I imagine it might be possible to get this behaviour if /proc/filesystems is suggesting ntfs-3G ahead of reiserfs and ext2. In that case, I can well imagine NTFS-3G borking as above in such a manner that it prevents other filesystems from being tried. ntrfug, could you post your /proc/filesystems here, please? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120403122618.ga5...@darac.org.uk
