on Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:25:50PM -0400, Bijan Soleymani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 01:42:28AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > E.g.: there are _good_, _solid_ reasons Debian doesn't allow Mozilla to > > run as root, why X11 TCP connections are disabled by default, and why > > SSH is strongly recommended. Yes, it's possible to override or ignore > > these settings, but that's not information I share, particularly not > > with newbies, on the simple principle that learning how to shoot > > yourself in the foot _might_ just provide you with some clue as to why > > this is a bad idea. > > I agree that security is generally a good thing, but some people turn it > into some sort of cult.
Security is a process. It involves application of principles. Consistently. With understanding. > Once upon a time I tried running FreeBSD (or was it NetBSD) and some > script I had died, because I didn't have permission to write to > /dev/null. That really made me laugh. *That* is a configuration issue. /dev/null should be world writeable. The fact that it wasn't indicates an improperly configured system. > One thing I really like to do is disable passwords for local logins. > But I'm sure there are people who will tell me that the CIA is going > to come to my house, tie me up, log into my computer and steal all my > mp3s or something :) I really like doing this because it saves me from > typing my password 300 times a day, and it doesn't make my computer > any easier to hack over the network. An why the hell are you typing your password 300 times a day? In my experience, this almost always indicates a misunderstanding of available tools. - For your local system, your login need be typed only when logging in, or when clearing your screensaver password. - For access to remote systems, you want to use ssh-agent, ssh, rsakey authentication, and a passphrase-protected SSH key. If you need help setting this up, or don't understand any of these terms, post to list. - Those two situations should cover the vast majority of your password use situations. Me? I end up typing my password probably a dozen times or so a day, generally when going root (via sudo), or when clearing my screensaver. Given that I live alone with a cat, I still lock my desktop when I walk away for any length of time, set xscreensaver to cut in (and lock) anyway, and require a password for 'sudo' on my personal account. > So I think there should be a proper balance between convenience and > security. For instance the current version of Outlook Express (aka > outhouse excess, etc.) defaults to preventing users from opening any > attachments: "Sorry this attachment could be a virus.". It does this > even with "plain/text" attachments. I've had to fix this on any number > of people. Even worse is the fact that Outlook's GPG/Mime handling is > broken and it actually doesn't show the message but shows it as an > attachment, which if the user clicks on it, gives them a warning > saying that it may be a virus. I mean this prevents legitimate > attachments like jpegs, etc. So users simply disable it, and you're > back to square one. First, this is debian-users, not wmswindows-users. Second, Microsoft Outlook is a security hole that happens to be an email client. Third: go away for a while and read: http://www.ccianet.org/papers/cyberinsecurity.pdf Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Scandinavian Designs: Cool furniture, affordable prices, great service, satisfied customer. http://www.scandinaviandesigns.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature