Kjetil writes: > But you run the risk of making a lot of unpriviliged power users very > angry if you do that.
Such power users should be able to have the noexec removed on request. Of course, they will be given a lecture and if they screw up will get no sympathy. > But I think I'll run home to mom and dad and do that on their > machine... :-) They are exactly who it is for. > I think that's the wrong question to ask... I think the question is "will > Linux vendors obey a market that wants executeable files to be executed > from email software if the user clicks on it?" Does the market really want that? Why? (That's an honest question. While I know this feature exists on Windows, I've never seen an example of what it is for.) -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
