On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:08:11 +0000, Brian wrote: > On Sun 12 Feb 2012 at 18:53:07 +0000, Camaleón wrote: > >> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:22:00 +0000, Brian wrote: >> >> > It means ifupdown was able to configure eth0 because there is now an >> > ethernet cable attached to it. >> >> But Harry said there was no cable connected to that card :-? > > In the post you responded to there is: > > I have connected something to the other ethernet port now ... and so > ifconfig -a reports (with me doing nothing special but having > rebooted): > > and > > both have received a dns served address (the one ending 42 is hard > coded at the router by MAC. The range 100-150 is left for misc).
Yes, I already read it but when he said "the other ethernet port" I thought he was referring to "eth1", of course, because there's no mistery otherwise. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jh944f$hiu$7...@dough.gmane.org