On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:08:11 +0000, Brian wrote:

> On Sun 12 Feb 2012 at 18:53:07 +0000, Camaleón wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:22:00 +0000, Brian wrote:
>> 
>> > It means ifupdown was able to configure eth0 because there is now an
>> > ethernet cable attached to it.
>> 
>> But Harry said there was no cable connected to that card :-?
> 
> In the post you responded to there is:
> 
>    I have connected something to the other ethernet port now ... and so
>    ifconfig -a reports (with me doing nothing special but having
>    rebooted):
> 
> and
> 
>    both have received a dns served address (the one ending 42 is hard
>    coded at the router by MAC.  The range 100-150 is left for misc).

Yes, I already read it but when he said "the other ethernet port" I 
thought he was referring to "eth1", of course, because there's no mistery 
otherwise.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jh944f$hiu$7...@dough.gmane.org

Reply via email to