On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:18:01 +0000, Brian wrote: > On Thu 24 Nov 2011 at 18:52:59 +0000, Camaleón wrote: > >> Ancient Greeks went to Oracle at Delphi to get answers. Now we have >> Google ;-) > > King Laius would have benefitted from a good dose of skeptism too. :)
If his majesty Laius would had the option of doing a Google search, he had found his own article (and so what the future reserved for him...) written at the "Olympuspedia" :-P >> I'm afraid the rootkit is not distribution specific. >> >> I would run a deep scan with the mentioned tool (rkhunter) to be sure. > > Whatever the doubtful merits of rkhunter (and its partner chkrootkit) > there isn't a lot to be said for installing and running an intrusion > detection program on a system which is suspected of being compromised. The analysis can be run offline, from a LiveCD. > The OP used DirectAdmin. So are we dealing with stable, testing or > unstable? Or none of these? The compilation may simply have produced a > buggy program or two. Yes, ensuring the binary package is not corrupted would neither hurt. In fact, I would do all of the tests we already have mentioned, just in case. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.11.25.16.59...@gmail.com
