On 07/03/2011 04:27 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 16:06:24 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
On 07/02/2011 04:04 AM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
I don't think he did. :)
Paul Scott<waterho...@ultrasw.com> wrote:
On 07/01/2011 03:46 PM, Brian wrote:
On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 15:19:21 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
1024x768 60.0*
800x600 60.3 56.2
848x480 60.0
640x480 59.9
My LCD monitor's native resolution is 1280x1024
xrandr believes VGA-1 is only capable of 1024x768. Why do you believe
1280x1024 is possible?
I didn't show all of xrandr:
You've not shown it here, either. :)
Oops! My current screen setup in addition to the wrong resolution has a
vertical displacement.
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1024 x 768, maximum 4096 x 4096
VGA-1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
0mm x 0mm
1024x768 60.0*
800x600 60.3 56.2
848x480 60.0
640x480 59.9
VGA-2 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
TV-1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
0mm x 0mm
720x576 50.0 +
1024x768 50.0*
800x600 50.0
720x480 50.0
640x480 50.0
400x300 100.0
320x240 100.0
320x200 100.0
DVI-D-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
Does this not say that the card will support up to 4096x4096 ?
No. 4096x4096 is the maximum virtual screen size.
Where do you find the output description? I didn't see it in man xrandr.
Thanks,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e1124d4.6050...@ultrasw.com
