On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 16:06:24 -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > On 07/02/2011 04:04 AM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
I don't think he did. :) >> Paul Scott<waterho...@ultrasw.com> wrote: >>> On 07/01/2011 03:46 PM, Brian wrote: >>>> On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 15:19:21 -0700, Paul Scott wrote: >>>>> 1024x768 60.0* >>>>> 800x600 60.3 56.2 >>>>> 848x480 60.0 >>>>> 640x480 59.9 >>>>> My LCD monitor's native resolution is 1280x1024 >>>> xrandr believes VGA-1 is only capable of 1024x768. Why do you believe >>>> 1280x1024 is possible? > > I didn't show all of xrandr: You've not shown it here, either. :) > VGA-1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > 0mm x 0mm > 1024x768 60.0* > 800x600 60.3 56.2 > 848x480 60.0 > 640x480 59.9 > VGA-2 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > TV-1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > 0mm x 0mm > 720x576 50.0 + > 1024x768 50.0* > 800x600 50.0 > 720x480 50.0 > 640x480 50.0 > 400x300 100.0 > 320x240 100.0 > 320x200 100.0 > DVI-D-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > > Does this not say that the card will support up to 4096x4096 ? No. 4096x4096 is the maximum virtual screen size. http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Xorg_RandR_1.2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110703232703.GW15615@desktop
