On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:06 -0400, William Hopkins wrote: > On 06/02/11 at 09:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > Unfortunately there seems to be no search engine able to replace > > Google's search engine. > > > > E.g. > > http://www.ixquick.com/ > > and > > http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm > > can't replace Google for my needs. > > Scroogle IS google. So.. not a great example?
The 'hacked' Google don't need plugins to ensure that Google doesn't collect your data. Not everybody is using Firefox. But Scroogle for the German language isn't really a German Google, hits very often are terrible translated English sides, when using Scroogle. Other search engines, such as Clusty became untrustworthy. > > > > Btw. I talk homepages down that use trackers, such as Google analytics. > > noscript and requestpolicy do a fair job at blocking such things. There are a lot more that can do this I know, but to be secure I don't like to leave the house armed with a Colt. If I would need a Colt to leave my home, I wouldn't feel comfortable. Analogies might be a little bit inappropriate, but IMO it's a similar situation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1307046103.1990.19.camel@debian