On Sunday 03 April 2011 01:20:10 Scott Ferguson wrote: > I suspect Liam's response was made in jest :-)
I'm sure it was - and a successful jest. But mine was not. In that case, context made the date's form redundant, but it _is_ a problem. Not major one, a very minor one. But a problem - and one with a very easy solution. I prefer the 11-04-01 (or 2011-04-01) solution to the one I myself offered, because month names in a foreign language (and for many here English is a foreign language), whilst certainly unambiguous, may be confusing. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201104030754.36535.lisi.re...@gmail.com
