On 02/04/11 14:57, Kelly Clowers wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 20:23, Scott Ferguson > <prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 02/04/11 13:50, Kelly Clowers wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 07:12, green <greenfreedo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Aaron Toponce wrote at 2011-04-01 08:11 -0500: >>>>> For international mailing lists, if you stick with ISO 8601, there should >>>>> be no ambiguity in the date: >>>>> >>>>> 2011-04-01 or 20110401 is defined as April 1, 2011, or truncated as >>>>> 11-04-01 or 110401. >>>>> >>>>> Standards. Who would have thought? >>>> >>>> Precisely. I'm in the US, but I always write dates like that. >>> >>> AOL >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Kelly Clowers >>> >>> >> >> Why not use the Debian standard?? >> day-of-week, dd month yyyy hh:mm:ss +zzzz > > Too verbose, not sortable > > Cheers, > Kelly Clowers > >
So... the RFC standards for internet communication is not good enough? or the Debian Policy standard or the standard of *this* mailing list:- (eg. as used in http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/04/msg00141.html) And *you* can't sort the in-place standards? Let me guess - do you also use the imperial measurement system? Did someone mention Cultural Imperialism earlier? ;-p Cheers -- Tuttle? His name's Buttle. There must be some mistake. Mistake? [Chuckles] We don't make mistakes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d96a36c....@gmail.com
