Kirk Strauser said: > At 2003-09-19T16:41:51Z, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> ..hmmm, cool. And in .procmailrc'ese it is? > > No. In Sieve-ese it is. See RFC 3028 for details.
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3028.txt This RFC doesn't say I have to use Sieve, just that they've created it so more people (hopefully) can easily filter email. Maybe someday procmail will come with a Sieve ruleset option. I thought your rules looked pretty lispish. Reading that RFC I see that it is CommonLisp. Now you've gone and reminded me that I've not played with Guile or Scheme for a while. Quote from Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, September 2001 http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/7.0b1/rsync/rsync/rsync3.txt - Sadly probably not enough people know Scheme. http://www.gnu.org/software/mailutils/mailutils.html#sieve If GNU sieve or sieve.scm work with that ruleset (or you know of another stand alone sieve parser) and return success if it handled the mail, and failure otherwise: # Rule expecting sieve to put the mail in a mailbox (like for IMAP) :0 Wc | sieve :Wa { # Sieve handled it, sticking it in the right mailboxes # so we don't need to do anything } This is just a general off-the-cuff guess. Lots of details to work out and options to tweak, like sieve knowing what rule file to use. -- Jacob Trying out SquirrelMail -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
