On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 18:46, Michael Kahle wrote: > James Strandboge wrote: > >On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 16:28, Michael Kahle wrote: > >>>Did you have the gnome2.2 woody backport installed? > >> > >> Yes I did. I was runny woody. I then installed the backport at a > >> later date. I the decided to switch to testing. > >> > >Glad dselect helped. It is not recommended to go from the backport > >to testing, but instead the backport to sid. The reason being is > >that much of the backport is much farther ahead of testing. > > > >I did correct a dependency issue with libxrender1.1 (which is from > >the backport) and libxrender1. You won't be able to install > >libxrender1 now without removing libxrender1.1. This should help > >people attempting what you did. > > I apologize. I went from stable to unstable (sid). I hope that my > slip did not prompt the propagation of a change that was unnecessary > or worse wrong!
Not at all. You having the problem clearly showed it needed to be done. When I initially packaged libxrender1.1, there was no such libxrender1 in sid. I needed to account for it. Jamie -- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG/PGP ID: 26384A3A Fingerprint: D9FF DF4A 2D46 A353 A289 E8F5 AA75 DCBE 2638 4A3A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
