Sven Joachim put forth on 11/1/2009 3:59 AM: > On 2009-11-01 10:54 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > >> On 2009-11-01 10:33 +0100, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> >>> It appears to be correct now. One question though... shouldn't my >>> hwclock be set to UTC, which in my case would be 6 hours difference? >>> Below shows only one hour... >>> >>> greer:/# date >>> Sun Nov 1 03:32:06 CST 2009 >>> greer:/# hwclock >>> Sun Nov 1 04:32:10 2009 -0.917266 seconds >> It is not documented in the manpage, but running hwclock without >> arguments seems to be equivalent to using the "--show" option, and that >> always displays local time even if your clock runs on UTC. > > While that is correct in itself, it does mean that there should be _no_ > difference in the time that "date" and "hwclock" report. Your problem > is that you're not actually using UTC.
greer:/# hwclock -u Sun Nov 1 00:01:58 2009 -0.768332 seconds Hmm... 4 hours difference, not 6. I'm really confused now. -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
