On 2009-11-01 10:54 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2009-11-01 10:33 +0100, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > >> It appears to be correct now. One question though... shouldn't my >> hwclock be set to UTC, which in my case would be 6 hours difference? >> Below shows only one hour... >> >> greer:/# date >> Sun Nov 1 03:32:06 CST 2009 >> greer:/# hwclock >> Sun Nov 1 04:32:10 2009 -0.917266 seconds > > It is not documented in the manpage, but running hwclock without > arguments seems to be equivalent to using the "--show" option, and that > always displays local time even if your clock runs on UTC.
While that is correct in itself, it does mean that there should be _no_ difference in the time that "date" and "hwclock" report. Your problem is that you're not actually using UTC. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
