2009/6/22 明�X <shi.min...@gmail.com>:
> 2009/6/22 Neal Hogan <nealho...@gmail.com>:
>> 2009/6/22 明�X <shi.min...@gmail.com>:
>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:11 PM,
>>> thveillon.debian<thveillon.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>Sebastian Günther wrote:
>>>>> * 明�X (shi.min...@gmail.com) [22.06.09 03:18]:
>>>>>> I want to keep the programs in my system all written in c/c++, no
>>>>>> python or perl or any other programming languages, is it possible to
>>>>>> reach it? I removed the 2 packages, python and perl, from my system,
>>>>>> and of cause, I losed my desktop, is it possible to install a desktop
>>>>>> manager without perl and python? which is the proper desktop manager?
>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> # apt-cache --installed rdepends (perl|python)
>>>>>
>>>>> should show you which packages depend on perl resp. python. Then you can
>>>>> decide wether you can live without them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But aren't "perl" or "python" packages just metapackages acting like
>>>> glue for all the others in the section ? I don't know if removing them
>>>> will have any effect on the libs already installed.
>>>> And doesn't the package configuration system needs python and/or perl
>>>> stuff ?
>>> yes, i hate it so much! if i remove python, the whole gnome
>>> environment are removed; if i remove perl, the whole xorg system is
>>> removed. I don't think it's a good design to make python or perl so
>>> bottom, especially for people who do not like python and perl, like
>>> me.
>>>>
>>>> aptitude search ~S~i~s'(perl|python)'  returns packages that look pretty
>>>> low-level stuff to me, most of which I have never installed manually but
>>>> were dragged in as dependencies.
>>>>
>>>> Looks like a strange idea to me to run a "one programming language only"
>>>> system, it would hint that there's a "one fits all" language and other
>>>> are just for decoration purpose... (Well, some may agree I guess ;-) )
>>> yes, currently, I'm almost a "one programming language only" people, I
>>> can accept the existence of other languages, but I think they should
>>> be optional, not necessory!
>>
>> Necessary for what?! For you to use a computer? It seems as though
>> you're being unreasonable (on many fronts), but if you are not fan of
>> certain software, then don't use it. Don't bitch about how it was
>> developed. Those folks (eg., gnome, X.org, etc.) produced a product
>> the way that they did and then offered it to the masses for free.
>>
>> <cliche>
>> Beggers can't be choosers.
>> </cliche>
> you treat yourself a begger, I'm not, I'm a chooser. Happy begging to you!
>>

I suggest you rethink the cliche and I wish you luck with the narrow
career strategy you've laid out for yourself.


>> Your a (self-proclaimed) junior programmer. Either deal with what's
>> freely available to you while climb the programmer ladder, or develop
>> it yourself (on paper, I guess).
>>
>>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
>>>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
>>>> listmas...@lists.debian.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gnu.Linux.(Debian|gNewSense).Gnome.(Mozilla|Gmail|Evolution|Scim|Flashplayer|Codeblocks)
>>> Microsoft.Windows.(Vista|XP).(QQ|Game|Notepad++) Gcc.Gtkmm.Opengl
>>> 初�U言�Z寂�纾�二�U�X�^寂�纾�三�U喜心寂�纾�四�U出入息寂��....于��欲心、嗔恚心、愚痴心不�贰⒔饷�,是���o上�U。
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
>>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
>>> listmas...@lists.debian.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Gnu.Linux.(Debian|gNewSense).Gnome.(Mozilla|Gmail|Evolution|Scim|Flashplayer|Codeblocks)
> Microsoft.Windows.(Vista|XP).(QQ|Game|Notepad++) Gcc.Gtkmm.Opengl
> 初�U言�Z寂�纾�二�U�X�^寂�纾�三�U喜心寂�纾�四�U出入息寂��....于��欲心、嗔恚心、愚痴心不�贰⒔饷�,是���o上�U。
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>
>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to